So a Chick Fil A has opened up near where I work and as with anything involving Chick Fil A there has been a protest movement. The other day I walked by the restaurant and on one side of the driveway were people protesting the restaurant's affiliation and donations to anti gay marriage organizations. On the other side of the driveway were people anti homosexuality protesters. For those that might not know the Chick Fil A is a strongly Christian company (they are closed on Sundays) and their current owner has donated money to several organizations that are anti gay marriage. These donations are not through the company directly, but through a non profit that the company has founded. One interesting thing about the protests was that both the protesters (at least the pro gay marriage ones) and the owner of this particular franchise were very respectful of each other. The owner said that he respects everyone, he brought out bottled water for everyone, and allowed use of his bathrooms. For their part the protesters acknowledged that their problem was with the Chick Fil A corporate owner and his politics. There were many signs advocating the boycott of Chick Fil A until they support gay rights and several comments about not patronizing their business until their stance changes. This got me thinking about the difference and similarities that exist with this situation and human rights violations in Asia during the production of many consumer products. In the case of Chick Fil A this restaurant is a franchise so only a portion of the earnings make their way back to the corporation and after that I'm fairly certain that only a portion of those funds make their way to the non profit which funds anti gay marriage. Even if 50 cents of every dollar went to the corporation I would be surprised if more than 5 cents (10% of the corporation's earnings) went to the nonprofit, which only represents 5% of the dollar that I spent. Conversely if I buy an Apple product or wear apparel manufactured in Asia I would bet that 20-25% of my money is going directly to pay for manufacturing. As stories involving FoxConn in China have shown the working conditions are beyond deplorable, the workers are paid well below what could be considered a living wage, and safety is barely a concern in the factories. My argument is we have to pick and choose our battles. It is clear that a portion of my money whenever spent is going to support some causes or organizations that I do not agree with and it is important to look at it all in perspective.